Workpackage mumber: WP1 |
Start date or starting event: month 0 |
Lead contractor number: 2 |
Person Months per Partner: PC1: 12, PC2: 18, PC3: 6, PC4: 12, |
PC7: 36, PC8: 12 |
Objectives and Input to Work Package
SST and SIE fields from coupled model simulations will be provided by WP3. Users will provide guidance (via WP4) to focus the analysis of decadal predictability. |
Description of work |
Partners 2, 3, 7 and 8 will provide or perform multidecadal ensemble
integrations, as described above, using four different atmospheric GCMs
(see 10.1, Table 1). The minimum ensemble size is four.
Partners 2 and 1 will coordinate the analysis of these integrations by partners 1, 2, 3, 4, 7 and 8. The analyses will employ a common set of key diagnostics, including pointwise analysis of potential predictability (e.g. Rowell, 1998) optimal detection of the most predictable components (i.e. space-time patterns), and comparison with reanalysis data sets. The diagnostics will be computed for all seasons and potential predictability will be assessed both for standard meteorological variables and for variables of specific interest to users (e.g. the frequency of extreme events). The way in which the atmospheric response feeds back onto the ocean will be diagnosed, and the results will provide input to WP2 and WP3. |
Description of work (continued) |
To understand and interpret the results from the multidecadal ensemble
integrations partners 1, 2, 3, 7 and 8 will perform additional ensemble
experiments with the four atmospheric GCMs. These experiments will be of
shorter duration. A basic set of experiments performed with each of the
models will be used to study the atmospheric response in each season to
the patterns of SST and SIE that analyses of observations, and analyses
of the multidecadal experiments, suggest are most important. Further experiments
will be done by each partner to assess the relative roles of subtropical
and extratropical SST, to assess the nonlinearity of the atmospheric response,
and to elucidate the thermodynamic and dynamical mechanisms that are responsible.
Partner 7 will investigate how the sensitivity of an atmospheric GCM to SST anomalies depends on the mean state of the model. This will be done by comparing the results of identical experiments with different models and by performing additional experiments in which a novel technique is used to reduce the systematic errors in the model mean state. Partner 7 will also use the model simulations to investigate decadal variations in extreme weather events. Partners 4 and 7 will investigate the atmospheric response to the decadal fluctuations in SST that arise in the coupled model simulations performed under WP3. |
Deliverables
D1 Quantitative assessment of potential atmospheric decadal predictability in all four seasons. D2 Comparison of the potential predictive skill in the each of the four agcms. D3 Analysis of how SST-forced decadal fluctuations can feed back to force the ocean. D4 Identification of the SST features that have most influence on Atlantic-European Climate. D5 Elucidation of the mechanisms via which tropical and higher latitude SST anomalies influence Atlantic-European climate. D6 Analysis of how and why the atmospheric response to SST anomalies depends on the atmospheric mean state and on model formulation. |
Milestones and expected result |
Month 12: Multidecadal ensemble integrations complete. |
Month 18: Analysis of multidecadal ensemble integrations complete. |
Month 34: Analysis of idealised experiments complete. |